- Product Selection (4.7)
- Availability (4.9)
- Design/Look (4.7)
- Affordability (4.9)
- Quality/Durability (4.5)
- Reputation (4.7)
- Product Selection (3.4)
- Availability (3.7)
- Design/Look (3.5)
- Affordability (4.3)
- Quality/Durability (3.2)
- Reputation (3.4)
Comparison winner
![Frigidaire](https://brandchoose.com/brand-logos/frigidaire.webp)
![Thor](https://brandchoose.com/brand-logos/thor.webp)
vs
vs
- Product Selection (4.7)
- Availability (4.9)
- Design/Look (4.7)
- Affordability (4.9)
- Quality/Durability (4.5)
- Reputation (4.7)