LG vs. Whirlpool Dishwashers

Build Quality & Durability

Durability is one of the biggest concerns when buying a dishwasher. A machine that cleans well but breaks down in a few years isn’t worth it. LG and Whirlpool take different approaches to build quality. LG focuses on premium materials and advanced engineering, while Whirlpool prioritizes long-term reliability and ease of maintenance. But which one actually holds up better over time?

At this price point, both brands make sacrifices, but Whirlpool’s choices are often more repairable, while LG’s designs feel more modern but slightly more fragile.

Whirlpool uses full plastic tubs in most budget models, which are cheaper to manufacture but less effective at heat retention. This means longer drying times and potential odor absorption. However, plastic tubs won’t rust, and Whirlpool’s simpler parts are easier to replace if something fails.

LG opts for a hybrid tub design, with stainless steel on the interior walls but plastic on the base. This helps improve durability while keeping costs down, but the plastic base is still a weak point for long-term wear.

Racks also show clear differences. Whirlpool’s budget models often stick with vinyl-coated racks, which can crack and expose metal to rust over time. LG uses nylon-coated racks, which last longer and resist wear better.

✅ Verdict: Whirlpool is more repair-friendly, but LG’s hybrid tub and better racks give it a slight edge.

As you move up in price, both brands improve their materials, but LG’s build feels more premium, while Whirlpool’s is more utilitarian.

Whirlpool upgrades to stainless steel tubs in most models, making drying more efficient and reducing odor buildup. However, some models still use vinyl-coated racks, which are less durable than nylon alternatives.

LG switches to full stainless steel tubs, improving heat retention, durability, and drying performance. Racks are always nylon-coated, making them more resistant to rust and chipping.

Noise insulation also becomes a bigger factor in this price range. LG’s dishwashers tend to be quieter, with better insulation and softer-close doors, while Whirlpool’s models remain slightly louder, though still acceptable.

✅Verdict: LG offers a more premium, refined build, while Whirlpool sticks to practicality.

At the high end, both brands showcase their best materials and construction, but LG pushes innovation, while Whirlpool stays conservative with proven designs.

LG’s premium models feature thick stainless steel tubs, ultra-quiet insulation (as low as 38 dBA), and auto-opening doors. While these features improve convenience, they also introduce more moving parts that could fail over time.

Whirlpool focuses on traditional reliability, keeping its materials high-quality but avoiding over-engineering. Some high-end models still lack advanced drying tech like LG’s TrueSteam®, but they rely on proven long-lasting components.

LG’s high-tech build comes with a risk of more expensive repairs, while Whirlpool’s straightforward construction makes it easier and cheaper to maintain.

✅ Verdict: LG has the best high-end materials, but Whirlpool is easier to maintain long-term.

Washing Performance

Cleaning power is where a dishwasher proves its worth—and where the differences between LG and Whirlpool become clear. Both brands get the job done, but their approaches are starkly different.

At the entry level, neither brand is perfect.

Whirlpool relies on a standard spray arm and soil sensors, meaning cleaning performance varies based on load size and placement. It does well with lightly soiled dishes but struggles with baked-on grime—you may need to pre-rinse.

LG, on the other hand, uses a multi-motion spray system, covering more angles than Whirlpool’s traditional design. This gives LG dishwashers an edge with tough messes, but cycle times tend to be longer, and drying performance is hit or miss.

✅ Verdict: LG cleans slightly better, but Whirlpool is more predictable.

Mid-range models introduce more aggressive spray systems and improved filtration.

Whirlpool’s TotalCoverage spray arm adds more nozzles for better reach, helping with stubborn residue. Its sensor-based wash cycles also adjust water pressure automatically, optimizing for efficiency.

LG counters with multi-directional spray arms and steam cleaning, reducing water spots and baked-on food. However, longer cycles remain an issue, and some users report inconsistent drying results.

Whirlpool’s cycles are faster and more predictable, while LG’s steam and spray coverage offer a stronger, deeper clean.

✅ Verdict: LG excels at deep cleaning, Whirlpool is faster and more efficient.

At the top-tier level, both brands deliver top-of-the-line performance, but the trade-offs remain.

LG’s steam-based cleaning technology sets it apart, breaking down tough stains without the need for pre-rinsing. Its multi-motion spray system reaches every corner, but drying can still be inconsistent without additional heat settings.

Whirlpool’s premium dishwashers feature third-rack wash zones and enhanced filtration, meaning better coverage and water circulation. Drying is also more reliable thanks to heated drying elements, something LG’s steam-drying systems don’t always match.

Want the most advanced cleaning tech? Go with LG. Prefer a no-fuss, consistently effective machine? Whirlpool wins.

✅ Verdict: LG is better at deep cleaning, but Whirlpool’s drying performance is stronger.

Energy & Water Efficiency

Energy efficiency isn’t just about lowering utility bills—it also determines how much water and electricity a dishwasher wastes over time. Both LG and Whirlpool offer Energy Star-certified models, but their approaches to efficiency differ.

In the budget range, both brands prioritize efficiency, but with some trade-offs.

Whirlpool’s budget models use sensor-based cycles that adjust water usage depending on soil levels, reducing waste. However, they lack steam drying, meaning extra energy is needed for heated drying cycles.

LG uses less water per cycle, and its hybrid drying system reduces energy consumption. But with longer cycle times, efficiency gains may be offset by increased electricity use.

✅ Verdict: Whirlpool is more balanced, while LG uses less water but takes longer.

In this category, both brands significantly improve efficiency.

Whirlpool maintains sensor-based water adjustments, but introduces more targeted spray zones, reducing the amount of water needed per cycle. It also offers heated drying options, ensuring dishes come out dry without requiring extra cycles.

LG pushes efficiency further with TrueSteam® drying, eliminating the need for excess heat cycles. However, steam drying isn’t always effective on plastics, which can lead to repeat drying cycles and increased energy use.

✅ Verdict: LG edges out slightly in water efficiency, but Whirlpool is better at reducing drying-related energy use.

At the high end, both brands are extremely efficient, but their approaches differ.

LG’s premium dishwashers maximize water efficiency with advanced spray motion and steam cycles that use less water than standard models. However, longer cycles remain a drawback.

Whirlpool’s premium dishwashers continue to rely on sensor-driven adjustments, ensuring the right amount of water and heat is used only when necessary. While LG is technologically ahead, Whirlpool’s smarter cycle adjustments mean less wasted time and electricity.

✅ Verdict: LG is the best at reducing water usage, Whirlpool is better at optimizing total cycle efficiency.

Capacity & Rack Adjustability

A dishwasher’s capacity isn’t just about how many dishes it can hold—it’s about how well it uses space. The placement of racks, adjustability, and third-rack functionality all play a role in making dish loading easy or frustrating. Here’s how LG and Whirlpool compare.

At the budget level, both brands offer standard 12-14 place settings, but the rack configurations differ.

Whirlpool sticks to a traditional two-rack setup, with some models featuring removable silverware baskets rather than dedicated third racks. Upper rack adjustability is rare, meaning tall glasses and larger pots may be difficult to fit.

LG integrates more flexible upper racks, allowing users to adjust for taller dishes. Some budget models even include a basic third rack for utensils, creating more space in the lower rack for larger cookware.

✅ Verdict: LG provides slightly better adjustability, while Whirlpool sticks to a simpler but functional design.

Mid-range models improve space efficiency, but the differences in rack flexibility become more apparent.

Whirlpool introduces adjustable second racks, allowing users to shift them up or down to accommodate larger items below. However, its third rack designs are still fairly basic, mostly suited for flatware and small utensils rather than bowls or cups.

LG includes height-adjustable tines and deeper third racks in some models, making it easier to fit taller items or stack more dishes efficiently.

✅ Verdict: LG’s flexibility wins, though Whirlpool remains solid for standard loading needs.

At the premium level, both brands offer spacious, well-designed interiors, but LG takes adjustability to the next level.

LG’s high-end dishwashers feature a fully adjustable third rack, capable of holding small cups, silverware, and even bowls. Some models also include foldable tines and sliding upper racks, allowing for complete customization depending on the load.

Whirlpool’s premium dishwashers also improve third-rack functionality, but they tend to be more rigid in adjustability compared to LG. While their overall capacity remains competitive, Whirlpool’s focus remains on straightforward, reliable loading rather than high-tech flexibility.

✅ Verdict: LG’s premium dishwashers are the most versatile, but Whirlpool still offers solid, easy-to-load designs.

Wash Cycles & Programs

A dishwasher’s cleaning power isn’t just about water pressure—it’s also about the variety of wash cycles available. Some cycles save water, some tackle stubborn grime, and others speed up cleaning times. So, who offers better customization and smarter washing?

At the budget level, both brands cover the essentials, but their cycle options differ.

Whirlpool provides standard cycles—Normal, Heavy, 1-Hour Wash, and Eco. These cover most everyday needs, but there’s little customization beyond temperature adjustments. The 1-Hour Wash is fast but may not clean heavily soiled dishes thoroughly.

LG offers a similar set of cycles but adds a Steam Wash option in some models, which helps break down tough food stains without needing pre-rinsing. LG also integrates better soil sensors, allowing wash cycles to automatically adjust based on how dirty the load is—something Whirlpool’s budget models lack.

✅ Verdict: LG wins for better automation, but Whirlpool keeps things straightforward.

In this category, both brands introduce smarter wash cycle adjustments—but LG pulls ahead with extra flexibility.

Whirlpool steps up with Sensor Cycle technology, adjusting water temperature and pressure based on soil levels. It also adds a Sanitize cycle, which eliminates 99.9% of bacteria—a key feature for those who prioritize hygiene.

LG expands its cycle options with TrueSteam® technology, which reduces water spots and tackles stubborn grime without high heat drying. The Auto cycle dynamically adjusts water pressure, making LG models more adaptable for mixed loads.

✅ Verdict: LG is more customizable, while Whirlpool provides reliable, efficient performance.

At the high-end level, both brands introduce their most advanced wash cycles, but their priorities remain different.

LG’s premium models bring AI-powered wash cycles that adjust cycle time and water pressure dynamically. It also features Auto and Turbo cycles, which optimize for heavily soiled dishes. The TrueSteam® drying system minimizes water spots without excessive heat use.

Whirlpool keeps things practical with targeted wash zones, allowing for half-load washes when needed. It also improves drying performance with Fan Dry and Heated Dry options, which ensure dishes come out completely dry, something LG’s steam-drying system can sometimes struggle with.

✅ Verdict: LG offers more advanced cycle options, but Whirlpool delivers better drying performance and efficient cycle balancing.

Design & Installation

A dishwasher’s design isn’t just about looks—it’s about how well it integrates into your kitchen and how easy it is to install and use. While both LG and Whirlpool offer sleek designs, their approaches to usability, noise reduction, and installation flexibility differ.

At the budget level, both brands prioritize functionality, but Whirlpool is easier to install, while LG offers a more modern look.

Whirlpool’s budget models use front-facing controls, making them straightforward to operate but less seamless in modern kitchens. The finishes are mostly traditional stainless steel or white, and some models lack hidden heating elements, making installation easier but reducing drying performance.

LG’s budget dishwashers often have a sleeker design with recessed handles, giving them a cleaner, more modern look. Many models feature semi-hidden top controls, making them blend better with cabinetry. However, installation can be trickier, as LG models tend to have more insulation and precise leveling requirements.

✅ Verdict: LG looks better, Whirlpool is easier to install.

In the mid-range, both brands improve their designs, but Whirlpool focuses on practical usability, while LG leans into premium aesthetics.

Whirlpool introduces fingerprint-resistant finishes, reducing smudges—an advantage for busy households. Installation remains straightforward, and their models prioritize reliability over aesthetics. The door design is simple and functional, with some models offering integrated controls but not full panel-ready options.

LG enhances its sleekness with fully hidden top controls, recessed handles, and flush-mount door designs that allow the dishwasher to blend seamlessly with cabinetry. Some models even feature knock-to-open doors, adding a premium touch—but these features can also make installation more complex.

✅ Verdict: LG is the better fit for modern kitchens, but Whirlpool keeps things simpler and more practical.

At the premium level, LG prioritizes sleek aesthetics and advanced features, while Whirlpool sticks to practical, long-lasting designs.

LG’s premium dishwashers feature flush installation, panel-ready options, and advanced noise insulation. Some models are so quiet that they project a status light onto the floor instead of using a loud chime. Auto-opening doors and touchless controls also add to LG’s high-tech experience—but these features can complicate installation and repairs.

Whirlpool keeps things streamlined but functional. High-end models fit seamlessly under countertops, but Whirlpool doesn’t emphasize flush-mount or panel-ready options as much as LG. Instead, it ensures reliable hinges, smooth door operation, and effective noise reduction. While Whirlpool models may not look as high-tech, they are built for straightforward installation and everyday use.

✅ Verdict: LG is better for seamless, modern kitchens. Whirlpool is more practical and easier to maintain.

Features & Technologies

Smart features and advanced technology can make a dishwasher more convenient and efficient. While both LG and Whirlpool offer smart connectivity, improved drying methods, and leak protection, their approaches to innovation differ. LG focuses on cutting-edge automation, while Whirlpool prioritizes practical, reliable enhancements.

In the budget range, both brands stick to essential features, but LG adds a few extras.

Whirlpool’s budget models focus on reliable, no-frills cleaning, with sensor-based washing and heated drying options. However, they lack smart connectivity, and drying performance relies on basic heating elements, which can lead to higher energy use.

LG integrates steam cleaning in some models, reducing water spots and baked-on food. Additionally, even some budget LG models include Wi-Fi connectivity, allowing users to start cycles remotely or receive maintenance alerts—something Whirlpool doesn’t offer at this price point.

✅ Verdict: LG leads with smart features and steam tech, while Whirlpool is more traditional.

At this level, both brands introduce more automation and specialized wash cycles, but their priorities differ.

Whirlpool integrates TotalCoverage Spray Arm technology, ensuring better water reach and more consistent cleaning. Their Fan Drying system is also more effective at preventing condensation, making dishes come out fully dry without extra cycles. However, Whirlpool still lags in smart features, with fewer models offering Wi-Fi connectivity or app controls.

LG enhances its automation with QuadWash™ multi-directional spray arms for improved coverage and TrueSteam® technology that reduces water spots. Many LG models in this range come with AI-powered wash cycles, which adjust water pressure and duration based on soil levels. Additionally, LG’s ThinQ® app allows users to track cycle status, receive notifications, and download new wash programs.

✅ Verdict: LG wins in smart tech, Whirlpool has better drying efficiency.

At the high end, both brands showcase their most advanced technologies, but they still follow different paths.

LG’s premium dishwashers are packed with smart features. Wi-Fi connectivity, AI-powered washing, voice control, and auto-opening doors create a futuristic experience. The TrueSteam® drying system reduces water spots without relying on excessive heat, which lowers energy use. However, more moving parts mean potential points of failure.

Whirlpool takes a more measured approach. While Wi-Fi connectivity is available, it’s not as integrated as LG’s ThinQ ecosystem. Instead, Whirlpool refines drying performance, using a combination of heated drying and fan-assisted technology for better results on plastic items. Some premium models also feature specialized spray zones for targeted cleaning, making them ideal for mixed loads.

✅ Verdict: LG leads in cutting-edge smart features, but Whirlpool is better for consistent drying and practical improvements.

Cost & Affordability

When it comes to prices, it’s not just about the upfront cost—it’s about long-term reliability, repair costs, and overall ownership expenses. While LG offers more advanced features, Whirlpool focuses on affordability and long-term durability. So, which brand actually saves you money?

Whirlpool’s entry-level dishwashers are among the most affordable on the market, while LG’s budget models typically cost more.

Whirlpool: Budget models range from $400 to $600, with some entry-level units occasionally dropping below $400 during sales.

LG: Most budget models start at $500 and go up to $750, with added costs for features like steam drying or smart connectivity.

✅ Verdict: Whirlpool is the cheaper option for budget buyers, typically costing $100–$150 less than LG.

In the mid-range, both brands offer a mix of affordability and advanced features, but Whirlpool still maintains a lower price point.

Whirlpool: Mid-range models generally fall between $650 and $1,000, offering strong performance without excessive pricing.

LG: These models usually cost $800 to $1,200, reflecting their more advanced technology and design elements.

✅ Verdict: Whirlpool continues to be the more affordable choice, typically saving buyers $150–$200 compared to LG.

At the high end, both brands introduce their best features, but LG models are priced significantly higher due to their cutting-edge technology.

Whirlpool: Premium dishwashers are priced between $1,100 and $1,600, offering strong performance at a relatively moderate cost.

LG: High-end models start around $1,400 and can go up to $2,000 or more, especially for models with AI-powered washing, auto-opening doors, and advanced steam drying.

✅ Verdict: Whirlpool remains the more affordable option, with LG's premium models often costing $300–$500 more.